Temple v. Wells, et al

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-30135
Summary Calendar
KEENAN TEMPLE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ED C. DAY, JR.; RICHARD STALDER; RONALD BONVILLIAN,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
(00-CV-2110-K)
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Keenan Temple, Louisiana prisoner no.
103483, appeals the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on grounds of qualified immunity.
Temple contends that the defendants conspired to violate his rights
by not timely revoking his parole and by not recalculating his
sentence during the Administrative Remedy Procedure (ARP) that
Temple initiated at the prison prior to seeking judicial relief.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Temple concedes that defendant Bonvillian is absolutely immune
from suit. The district court correctly determined that defendants
Day and Stalder enjoy qualified immunity because Temple failed to
show that their actions were not objectively reasonable “in light
of clearly established law” in existence at the time of his parole
revocation and ARP. Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 639, 641
(1987). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --