Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
January 5, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-51072
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GREGORY WALTER HOGLE,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(W-02-CR-61-1)
Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed appellate counsel for defendant Gregory Walter
Hogle has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hogle has
filed a pro se response brief, but he fails to identify any
nonfrivolous appellant issues. Our independent review of the
briefs and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is
-- 1 of 2 --
excused from further responsibilities; and the appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
