United States v. Henry

02-30386Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit6 janv. 2003

Texte intégral

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30386
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERT C. HENRY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CR-50057-02
--------------------
January 3, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Albert C. Henry has requested
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Henry has not responded to his
counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-30386
-2-
further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.