Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 17, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-21209
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
CHARLES EDWARD LAUDERDALE
Defendant - Appellant
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-890-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Charles Edward Lauderdale has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lauderdale has not
filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of
the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
