United States v. Rodriguez-Nunez

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
July 9, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-21187
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ-NUNEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-02-CR-123-1
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender has filed a motion for leave to
withdraw as counsel for Enrique Rodriguez-Nunez (Rodriguez) and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Rodriguez did not file a response to counsel’s
motion to withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-21187
-2-
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --