Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 18, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-31175
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDWARD D. MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CR-30026-1
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James H. Looney, court-appointed counsel for Edward D.
Mitchell, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Mitchell has filed a response arguing that his trial counsel was
ineffective for failing to argue at sentencing that Mitchell was
not a leader or organizer under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a).
Our review of the briefs and of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 01-31175
-2-
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
