United States v. Sulham

01-30079Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit25 juil. 2001

Texte intégral

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30079
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PETER SULHAM,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
(99-CR-60038-ALL)
July 20, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Peter Sulham appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being a
felon in possession of firearms. The Federal Public Defender
appointed to represent has moved for leave to withdraw and filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Sulham has received a copy of his counsel’s motion and brief, but has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

-- 1 of 1 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.