Texte intégral
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40727
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO DEANDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Texas
(USDC No. V-00-CR-40-1)
_______________________________________________________
December 15, 2000
Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Defendant-appellant Pedro Deanda pleaded true to the allegation that he
violated a term of his supervised release. He argues that under 18 U.S.C. §
-- 1 of 2 --
2
3583(e)(3), amended by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), the district court lacked the power to
sentence him to a term in prison followed by supervised release. This argument was
decided against him in Johnson v. United States, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 1807 (2000).
Despite appellant’s disagreement with Johnson, it is the law.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
