Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20600
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN CHIME,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-95-CR-108-3
--------------------
April 12, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John Chime appeals the 23-month sentence imposed by the
district court when it revoked his supervised release. He
contends that the district court failed to consider the Chapter 7
policy statements of the Sentencing Guidelines. Because Chime
failed to raise this issue in the district court, review is for
plain error only. See United States v. Ayers, 946 F.2d 1127,
1131 (5th Cir. 1991). In Ayers, we stated that when the district
court imposed a sentence within its discretion, “[t]he failure to
articulate a consideration of the [Chapter 7] policy statements
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 00-20600
-2-
was not plain error.” 946 F.2d at 1131. Chime does not contend
that his sentence was outside the statutory range. Because Chime
has identified no plain error, the sentence of the district court
is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
