Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20033
Summary Calendar
CEDRIC O’NEAL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
WYMAN-GORDON FORGINGS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-98-CV-2638
--------------------
October 2, 2000
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Cedric O’Neal appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his
claims against Wyman-Gordon Forgings, Inc. On appeal, he contends
that he presented summary judgment evidence that raised a fact
issue with respect to his claims alleging hostile work environment,
retaliation, and a Texas state law claim of intentional infliction
of emotional distress. Our de novo review of the summary judgment
evidence leads inexorably to the same conclusions reached by the
-- 1 of 2 --
district court with respect to appellant’s claims. The judgment of
the district court is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated
in its order granting summary judgment signed October 29, 1999.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
