Derek Lee Vinson v. Gary Ellis

99-7072Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 janv. 2000

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7072
DEREK LEE VINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GARY ELLIS; LYNNE ANN BATTAGLIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-99-1549-JFM)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Lee Vinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Derek Lee Vinson appeals the district court’s orders dismiss-
ing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) com-
plaint, denying his motion for reconsideration, denying his motion
for recusal, denying his motion to vacate the district court’s
memorandum and order of dismissal, and denying as moot his motion
for extension of time to file notice of appeal. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Vinson v. Ellis, No.
CA-99-1549-JFM (D. Md. June 9, July 1, July 7, July 23 & Aug. 5,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.