Mwaalkebu-Lan Akil v. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2603
MWAALKEBU-LAN AKIL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, U.S.
Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-99-18-3)
Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mwaalkebu-Lan Akil, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Laree Martin, Sonya
J. Penn, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Mwaalkebu-Lan Akil appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in his employment
discrimination suit alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994), and the Equal Pay
Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 206(d) (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Akil v. Henderson, No. CA-99-18-3 (E.D. Va.
Nov. 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --