Michael Hodges v. Kiara Harris

20-1256United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit27 août 2020

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1256

MICHAEL HODGES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KIARA HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ASHLEY K. TUNNER, Judge; J. BELL, Agent DCSE; PATRICIA R. BATLEY,
Court Clerk,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00955-DJN)

Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Hodges, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Michael Hodges appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his
complaint as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim.
*
We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hodges v. Harris, No. 3:19-cv-00955-DJN (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2020 & Feb. 25, 2020).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

*
Although the district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, we have
jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 611 (4th Cir.
2020).

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.