Repaunzel Jackson v. Girl Scouts Council of Colonial Coast; Tracy Keller

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1053

REPAUNZEL JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GIRL SCOUTS COUNCIL OF COLONIAL COAST; TRACY KELLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:18-cv-00129-MSD-RJK)

Submitted: May 21, 2020 Decided: May 27, 2020

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Repaunzel Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Milena Radovic, Kristina H. Vaquera, JACKSON
LEWIS PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Repaunzel Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion
to dismiss her discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2018), and the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2018), and declining
to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Jackson’s state law breach of contract claims.
We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments Jackson raises in her
informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th
Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Finding no reversible error, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. See Jackson v. Girl Scouts Council, No. 4:18-cv-00129-
MSD-RJK (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED