John Venizelos v. JENNIFER SAAD, Warden

19-7207United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit13 mars 2020

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7207

JOHN VENIZELOS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JENNIFER SAAD, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv -00119-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Venizelos, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
John Venizelos appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for fees and
costs and for reconsideration following the dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.