In re: Nivaldo Riascos

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2126

In re: NIVALDO RIASCOS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:19-cv -00254)

Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nivaldo Riascos, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Nivaldo Riascos petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has
unduly delayed ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) habeas petition. Riasco seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action in Riasco’s § 2241
petition—namely, extending the period for Riasco to file objections to the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED