Dr. Akeda Pearson v. Board of Education of Anne Arundel County

19-2121United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit23 mars 2020

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2121

DR. AKEDA PEARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; MAMIE
PERKINS, Interim Superintendent, in her official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ARLEN LIVERMAN, Deputy Superintendent; GEORGE ARLOTTO, Chief of
Staff,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02358-CCB)

Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 23, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

2

Akeda Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Kemp Walden Hammond, ANNE ARUNDEL
COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

3

PER CURIAM:
Akeda Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants in Pearson’s employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Pearson v. Board of Educ. Of Anne Arundel Cnty., No. 1:17-cv-02358-CCB (D.
Md. Sept. 10, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.