Marie-Therese H. Assa’ad-Faltas, Md v. Tandy Carter, individually for damages for qui tam recovery

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1672
MARIE-THERESE H. ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TANDY CARTER, individually for damages for qui tam recovery; BARBARA
JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery; SARA
HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery;
THE GINGLIAT, BETTIS AND SAVITZ LAW FIRM, in its corporate capacity,
for damages and for qui tam recovery; STEPHEN SAVITZ; JENNIFER CARR
SAVITZ; THE MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE LAW FIRM, in its
corporate capacity for damages and for qui tam recovery; JOHN ANDREW
DELANEY; STERLING DAVIES; GAFFORD THOMAS COOPER, JR.;
MARION ONEIDA HANNA; MICHAEL KING, present or former Assistant City
of Columbia Manager; ANGELA LADSEN, City of Columbia Ministerial
Recorder; RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; LEON
LOTT, officially as Sheriff of Richland County, South Carolina; JEANETTE
MCBRIDE, RC's Clerk of Court; BRETT BAYNE; JAMES R. BARBER, II.;
HARRY STUBBLEFIELD, RCSD Captain; DARRYL PRICE, RCSD Lieutenant;
CALVIN HILL, RCSD Deputy; DEANDREA BENJAMIN GIST; KEN GAINES;
ROBERT G. COOPER; DANA M. THYE; DAVID A. FERNANDEZ; CITY OF
COLUMBIA, SC, POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN K. PASSMORE; AMANDA
H. LONG BRANHAM; DEBBIE JORDAN; BURKE, CPD former acting chief;
RUBEN SANTIAGO, CPD former acting chief; CAPTAIN HENDRIX;
CAPTAIN THORNTON; LIEUTENANT BUTZER; LIEUTENANT EVANS;
LIEUTENANT GIBSON; LIEUTENANT SHARP; LIEUTENANT SMITH;
LIEUTENANT YATES; LAWRENCE P. AULD; SERGEANT DRAFTS;
SERGEANT GUNTHER; SERGEANT SANDERS; CORPORAL BRANHAM
BELL; CORPORAL CALDWELL; CORPORAL GOMEZ-RIEVERA; BRIAN,
CPD Investigator; BLANTON, CPD Investigator; NAREWSKI, CPD Investigator;
OFFICER ASHMORE; OFFICER BROWN; OFFICER DEJESUS; OFFICER
GIRARD; KELSON; OFFICER MCSWAIN; OFFICER MEDLOCK; OFFICER
WHITE; BARNEY GIESE; JOHN MEADORS; DAVID ROSS; DINAH GAIL

-- 1 of 3 --

2
STEELE; LARRY WAYNE MAON; WENDY CEO, a/k/a Windy Cio; ROBERT
D. COBLE; CHARLENE CROUCH; COREY LAMONT CURRY; TERESA
INGRAM; JOHN MITCHELL JONES; TIFFANY LURKE; CHRISTOPHER
JAMES MASON; RICHARD WAYNE MASON; WILLIAM TETTERTON;
ALDEN HOLLIS WHEELER; RICHARD GLENN WHEELER; JOHN DOE;
JANE ROE; DANA TURNER, falsely bearing a title of Chief Administrative
Judge of the City's Municipal Court; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA;
NIMRATA R. HALEY; ALAN WILSON, as SC's Attorney General; YANCEY
MCGILL, as SC's Lieutenant Governor; JOHN COURSON; SC'S JUDICIAL
MERIT SELECTION COMMISSION; JEAN TOAL; DANIEL SHEAROUSE;
JENNY KITCHENS; V. CLAIRE ALLEN; MARK KEEL; LEROY SMITH;
DANIEL JOHNSON, as SC's Fifth Judicial Circuit's Solicitor; GARY WATTS, as
Coroner for Richland County, SC; ROBERT ELDON HOOD, as Current SC's
Fifth Judicial Circuit's Administrative Judge for General Sessions; LESLIE
COGGIOLA, as SC's Disciplinary Counsel; ROSLYNN FRIERSON, as Director
of SC's Office of Court Administration; WILLIAM NETTLES, as US Attorney for
the District of South Carolina; STEVEN BENJAMIN, as Mayor; ALL MEMBERS
OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL; TERESA WILSON, manager for the
City,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00678-CCE-LPA)
Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese H. Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s order denying her
self-styled Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen her civil action against numerous
defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Faltas’ motions for appointment of counsel and for this court to reconsider its order
deferring action on the motion for appointment of counsel, and we affirm the district
court’s order. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Carter, No. 1:14-cv-00678-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C.
Apr. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --