Altony Brooks v. MICHAEL JOHNSON, Sheriff

16-6512Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 oct. 2016

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6512
ALTONY BROOKS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL JOHNSON, Sheriff; BRENDA LAMBERT, Detective; JUSTIN
WHACK, Detective; WAYNE DEWITT, Sheriff; LONNIE ALLEN
MIZZELLE, Detective; DANNY MIZZELLE, Detective; JOHN DOE,
Officer; KIMBERLY BARR, Solicitor; SHARON W STAGGERS,
Clerk; M MORRIS, Clerk, sued in their individual and
official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:15-cv-01074-PMD)
Submitted: October 11, 2016 Decided: October 27, 2016
Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Altony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice, and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Brooks v. Johnson, No. 2:15-cv-01074-PMD
(D.S.C. Apr. 11 & May 25, 2016). We deny Brooks’ motion to
appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.