Michael Eugene Owens v. Dillard’s

16-1441Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 sept. 2016

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1441
MICHAEL EUGENE OWENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DILLARD’S,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
WILLIAM T. DILLARD, II; HIGBEE LANCOMS, LP; JIM GREEN, Store
Manager; PAUL CLOSE, Assistant Manager; KEITH WHITE,
District Manager,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00433-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: August 30, 2016 Decided: September 8, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Eugene Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Ruth Dangel,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Eugene Owens appeals the district court’s order
denying Owens’ motion to set aside an arbitration award. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Owens v. Dillard’s, No. 3:14-cv-00433-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C.
Apr. 13, 2016). We deny Owens’ motions to subpoena for
interrogatories, for production of documents, for a transcript
at Government expense, and for lay and expert witnesses. We
grant Dillard’s motion to strike Owens’ press release and deny
Dillard’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.