Butchie J. Stemple v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; KEITH K. ARNOLD, Chief; KEVIN LAMP, Chaplain

15-6216Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 juil. 2015

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6216
BUTCHIE J. STEMPLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; KEITH K. ARNOLD, Chief; KEVIN
LAMP, Chaplain,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-01739-ELH)
Submitted: June 30, 2015 Decided: July 29, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Butchie J. Stemple, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Butchie J. Stemple appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Appellees on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stemple’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm substantially on the reasoning
of the district court.* Stemple v. Shearin, No. 1:14-cv-01739-
ELH (D. Md. Feb. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although Stemple’s claim for equitable relief may not have
been barred by Appellees’ qualified immunity, see Wall v. Wade,
741 F.3d 492, 497 n.9 (4th Cir. 2014) (noting that qualified
immunity is inapplicable to claims for equitable relief), we
conclude that the claim nevertheless fails on the merits. See
Republican Party of N.C. v. Martin, 980 F.2d 943, 952 (4th Cir.
1992) (“[W]e may affirm a judgment for any reason appearing on
the record.”). See generally Wall, 741 F.3d at 498-99
(providing test for determining when prison policy violates
First Amendment).

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.