David T. Clenney v. Officer V. R. Swartz

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1535
DAVID T. CLENNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER V. R. SWARTZ,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David T. Clenney, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, Jamie
Marie Greenzweig, David Isaac Klass, FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David T. Clenney appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Clenney v.
Swartz, No. 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --