Reine Monique Thiemele Wodie v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1068
REINE MONIQUE THIEMELE WODIE,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of An Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: September 16, 2015 Decided: September 30, 2015
Before KEENAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Bardavid, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C.
Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Blair T.
O’Connor, Assistant Director, Scott M. Marconda, OFFICE OF
IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Reine Monique Thiemele Wodie, a native and citizen of the
Ivory Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal of the
Immigration Judge’s denial of Wodie’s requests for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record,
including the transcript of Wodie’s merits hearing, her asylum
application, and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the
record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)
(2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s
decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Wodie (B.I.A. Dec. 19,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --