Harold E. Strickland v. Commonwealth of Virginia

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7848
HAROLD E. STRICKLAND,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; DR. PAUL C. OHAI, Powhatan
Correctional Center; DR. RONALD W. TONEY, Powhatan
Correctional Center; NURSE WANDA DAVENPORT, Powhatan
Correctional Center; ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES,
INC.; DR. FRANK STURMER, Mecklenburg Correctional Center;
DR. MARK MILITANA, Mecklenburg Correctional Center; DR.
MARY CLARKE, Deep Meadows Correctional Center; NURSE W.
REED, Deep Meadows Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-7849
HAROLD E. STRICKLAND,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ARMOR CORRECTIONAL
HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; DR. FRANK STURMER, Mecklenburg
Correctional Center; DR. MARY CLARKE, Deep Meadows
Correctional Center; NURSE W. REED, Deep Meadows
Correctional Center; MS. CLOUD, Food Service Manager- Deep
Meadows Correctional Center; DR. PAUL C. OHAI, Powhatan
Correctional Center; DR. RONALD W. TONEY, Powhatan
Correctional Center; NURSE WANDA DAVENPORT, Powhatan
Correctional Center,

-- 1 of 3 --

Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00485-JPJ-PMS; 7:13-cv-00484-JPJ)
Submitted: May 28, 2015 Decided: June 18, 2015
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold E. Strickland, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Ramon
Rodriguez, III, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond,
Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

PER CURIAM:
Harold E. Strickland appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying
relief on his complaints raising various claims under state and
federal law, and denying his motions for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Strickland v. Virginia, No. 7:13-cv-00485-JPJ-PMS (W.D.
Va. Nov. 17, 2014); Strickland v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr., No.
7:13-cv-00484-JPJ (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2014). We deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3

-- 3 of 3 --