Frankie Jae Lordmaster, f/k/a Jason Robert Goldader v. G. HINKLE, Regional Director

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7074
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, f/k/a Jason Robert Goldader,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
G. HINKLE, Regional Director; MR. JENNINGS, Ex-Warden of
Augusta Correctional Center; BUILDING C/D SERGEANT;
BUILDING C/D LIEUTENANT; LT. WHEELER; LINKENHOLKER;
SHIFFLET, a/k/a Shiflett,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER PERSONNEL; UNKNOWN; VIRGINIA
D.O.C. AGENTS; OTHER AGENTS OF GOVERNMENT; COMMON FARE:
DEFENDANTS AT ACC; LAW LIBRARY: DEFENDANTS AT ACC; PERSONAL
SAFETY: DEFENDANTS AT ACC PERSONNEL; DISEMMINATION:
DEFENDANTS AT OR OUTSIDE ACC; RETALIATION: DEFENDANTS AT
ACC, Cell Search or resultant; RETALIATION: DEFENDANTS AT OR
OUTSIDE ACC, Transfer or resultants,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00506-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 22, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frankie Jae LordMaster, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Frankie Jae LordMaster appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to some Defendants on
LordMaster’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and dismissing
without prejudice the claims against the remaining Defendants
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
LordMaster’s pending Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. LordMaster v.
Hinkle, No. 7:13-cv-00506-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. July 9, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --