Glenn Henderson v. David Loar McKenzie

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2269
GLENN HENDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID LOAR MCKENZIE; SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT; KIM RUSSO;
SCHMID & VOILES; KATHLEEN MCCOLGAN, Esq.; ROSEN & SABA, LLP;
JAMES ROSEN, Esq.; ADELA CARRASCO, Esq.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00029-FL)
Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenn Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. David Loar Mckenzie, SANDS
ANDERSON PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Glenn Henderson appeals the district court’s orders
imposing a pre-filing injunction and denying Henderson’s Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that order. We have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in imposing the pre-filing injunction. See
Cromer v. Kraft Foods N.A., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817-18 (4th Cir.
2004) (setting forth standard of review and four factors used to
evaluate propriety of a pre-filing injunction). Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Henderson v. Mckenzie, No. 5:14-cv-00029-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2 &
Oct. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --