Christopher Tyler Long; Christopher Emmett Long; Edy Long v. M&mtransportation, LLC

14-2004Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 mai 2015

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2004
CHRISTOPHER TYLER LONG; CHRISTOPHER EMMETT LONG; EDY LONG,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
M&M TRANSPORTATION, LLC; MILLER & SONS AUTO AND TRUCK
REPAIR, INC.; KEVIN E. MILLER; KENNETH ANDREW MILLER, JR.;
PEGGY MILLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: April 30, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher James Regan, J. Zachary Zatezalo, Laura P. Pollard,
BORDAS & BORDAS, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants.
Tracey A. Rohrbaugh, Julie R. Shank, BOWLES RICE, LLP,
Martinsburg, West Virginia; Stephen M. Houghton, DICKIE, MCCAMEY
& CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Tyler Long, Christopher Emmett Long, and Edy
Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for
partial summary judgment and granting Appellees’ revised motion
for summary judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and
the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Long v.
M&M Transp., LLC, No. 3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 5,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.