William Roosevelt Cloud v. United States of America

13-6047Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 mars 2013

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6047
WILLIAM ROOSEVELT CLOUD,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; KURT W. MEYERS; MICHAEL SAVAGE;
KENNETH RANDALL; FRANK D. WHITNEY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00775-RJC)
Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013
Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Roosevelt Cloud, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Roosevelt Cloud appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403
U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Cloud v. United States, No.
3:12-cv-00775-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.