Mary Ann Dunope v. Arcelormittal Steel

13-2272Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 avr. 2014

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2272
MARY ANN DUNOPE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ARCELORMITTAL STEEL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00058-JPB-JES)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Ann Dunope, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Charles Baldwin,
Christine Mary Costantino, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C.;
Bradley K. Shafer, SWARTZ CAMPBELL, LLC, Wheeling, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Mary Ann Dunope appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing her complaint alleging employment discrimination
claims under the ADA and ERISA violations and denying her motion
to alter or amend the dismissal order. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Dunope v.
ArcelorMittal S.A., No. 5:13-cv-00058-JPB-JES (N.D.W. Va.
Aug. 14 & Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.