Salame M. Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1637
SALAME M. AMR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; GREGORY CLAYTON FLEMING;
RONALD NICHOLAS REGNERY; SCOTT GREGORY CROWLEY, SR.; CROWLEY
& CROWLEY LAW FIRM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv—00423-REP-MHL)
Submitted: September 25, 2013 Decided: October 4, 2013
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Scott
Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Glen Allen, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying his
“Petition for Pre-filing Motions and Amended Petition for Pre-
filing of Motions and Responses.” We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Att’y Gen., No.
3:11-cv-00423-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --