Howell W. Woltz v. Jeremy Nash, individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6275
HOWELL W. WOLTZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEREMY NASH, individually and in his official capacity;
BRIGETTE SEAFUS, individually and in official capacity; JOEL
ZIEBLER, individually and in his official capacity and
unnamed defendants,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00058)
Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 25, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se. J. Christopher Krivonyak,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint, which was filed pursuant
to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to exhaust his
available administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record
and conclude the district court did not err in reaching this
dispositive conclusion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Woltz v. Nash, No. 5:11-cv-
00058 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --