Judy Kay Miskell v. Conrad W. Varner

12-2521Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 févr. 2013

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2521
In Re: JUDY KAY MISKELL,
Petitioner.
_______________
On Petition for Writ of Prohibition.
(3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ)
No. 12-2549
JUDY KAY MISKELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CONRAD W. VARNER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh,
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ)
Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 27, 2013
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
No. 12-2521 petition denied; No. 12-2549 affirmed by unpublished
per curiam opinion.
Judy Kay Miskell, Petitioner/Appellant Pro Se. Melvin F.
O’Brien, DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court’s order
denying her Rule 59 motion. Miskell has also petitioned for a
writ of prohibition and filed a motion to stay. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court, deny the petition
for a writ of prohibition, and deny the motion to stay. Miskell
v. Varner, No. 3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 12,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
No. 12-2521 PETITION DENIED
No. 12-2549 AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.