Marge Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2332
MARGE IANNUCCI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
MICHAEL A. IANNUCCI,
Plaintiff,
v.
RITE AID CORPORATION, et al,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH)
Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Michael
Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Marge Iannucci appeals the district court’s order
entering judgment in her employment discrimination action in
accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 offer and
dismissing the remainder of the action for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction. She also appeals the order compelling
discovery and entering a confidentiality order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C.
July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --