Edmond Machie v. AMBER ULLAH, Collector, Fairfax County Federal Credit Union

12-1556Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 oct. 2012

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1556
EDMOND MACHIE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
AMBER ULLAH, Collector, Fairfax County Federal Credit
Union; GUSTAVO FERNANDEZ, Collector, Fairfax County Federal
Credit Union; PATRICK MCINERENEY, Collector, Fairfax County
Federal Credit Union; DONALD E. COULTER, Esquire,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00010-AJT-IDD)
Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edmond Machie, Appellant Pro Se. Richard D. Holzheimer, Jr., Amy
Sanborn Owen, COCHRAN & OWEN, LLC, Vienna, Virginia; John
Elphinstone McIntosh, Jr., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edmond Machie appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for an extension of time and dismissing his
civil complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Machie’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Machie has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.