Gary M. Gray v. Wittstadt Title and Escrow Company LLC; Morris/ Hardwick/ Schneider; One West Bank, Fsb

12-1251Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 août 2012

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1251
GARY M. GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WITTSTADT TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY LLC; MORRIS/ HARDWICK/
SCHNEIDER; ONE WEST BANK, FSB,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:11-cv-00111-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary M. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Roger Hildebeidel, MORRIS
HARDWICK SCHNEIDER, PLLC, Dulles, Virginia; Amy Elizabeth
Miller, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Anand Vijay Ramana,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gary M. Gray appeals the district court’s dismissal of
his complaint and its denial of his post-judgment motions to
amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and to amend the
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Gray v. Wittstadt Title & Escrow Co., No. 4:11-
cv-00111-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va., Nov. 28, 2011, Jan. 25, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.