William Fitchett; Brad R. Johnson v. County of Horry

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2379
WILLIAM FITCHETT; BRAD R. JOHNSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF HORRY; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; M. LOIS EARGLE;
RODDY DICKINSON; TIM CHRISTOPHER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:10-cv-01648-TLW)
Submitted: April 24, 2012 Decided: May 15, 2012
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Fitchett and Brad R. Johnson, Appellants Pro Se. Jerome
Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Fitchett and Brad R. Johnson appeal the
district court’s orders and judgment accepting the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation and granting the Appellants’
motion for judgment on the pleadings and denying their motion
for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. We have reviewed
the record, including the magistrate judge’s order denying the
motion for leave to file an amended complaint, the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation and the district court’s
orders and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Fitchett v. County of
Horry, No. 4:10-cv-01648-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011; Nov. 16,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --