Brenda L. Williams v. Altec Industries, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1961
BRENDA L. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ALTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00356-BO)
Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Elizabeth Shea,
CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Brenda L. Williams appeals the district court’s order
granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this
employment discrimination action. We affirm.
With respect to Williams’ claim of race and sex
discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
as amended, her claim under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C.
§ 206(d)(1) (2006), her claim of a hostile work environment, and
her state law claim for negligent infliction of emotional
distress, we review the district court’s grant of summary
judgment de novo, viewing the facts and drawing reasonable
inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the
nonmoving party. Bonds v. Leavitt, 629 F.3d 369, 380 (4th
Cir.), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 398 (2011). We have reviewed
the record with this standard in mind and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Williams v. Altec Industries, Inc., No.
5:10-cv-00356-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --