Cheryl B. Carter v. McCreary Modern, Incorporated

11-1901Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit7 mars 2012

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1901
CHERYL B. CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCCREARY MODERN, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC)
Submitted: February 28, 2012 Decided: March 7, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jenny L. Sharpe, LAW OFFICE OF JENNY L. SHARPE, Charlotte, North
Carolina; Tamara W. Brooks, BROOKS LAW OFFICE, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Stephen M. Thomas, Michael P. Thomas,
Susan W. Matthews, PATRICK, HARPER & DIXON, L.L.P., Hickory,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Cheryl B. Carter appeals from the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of McCreary Modern,
Inc., in her action in which she alleged that McCreary regarded
her as disabled and employed improper qualifications standards
in denying her employment. We have reviewed the record on
appeal and the briefs filed by the parties and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Carter v. McCreary Modern, Inc., No.
5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.