B.d., by her parent other Heidi Dragomir v. JANA GRIGGS, Director of Special Services official

10-1858Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31 mars 2011

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1858
B.D., by her parent other Heidi Dragomir,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JANA GRIGGS, Director of Special Services official and
individual capacity of Buncombe County Board of Education;
MARY WATSON, Director of Exceptional Children Division of
Public Schools of N.C. Department of Public Instruction-
official capacity; ALEXA POSNY, U.S. Department of Education
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitation
Services-official capacity; JULIAN MANN, III, Director and
Chief Administrative Law Judge of Office of Administrative
Hearings; GEORGE MILLER, Education and Labor Committee
Congressman c/o Daniel Weiss-official capacity; BUNCOMBE
COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00439-MR-DLH)
Submitted: March 22, 2011 Decided: March 31, 2011
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
B.D., Appellant Pro Se. Karl Dean Shatley, II, CAMPBELL
SHATLEY, PLLC, Asheville, North Carolina; Brian R. Berman,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney
General, Laura Ellen Crumpler, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, John
D. Filamor, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Washington D.C., for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Heidi Dragomir appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and
dismissing without prejudice for lack of standing claims
Dragomir asserted on behalf of her minor child and dismissing
claims Dragomir asserted on her own behalf for failure to state
a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. B.D. v. Griggs, No. 1:09-cv-00439-MR-DLH
(W.D.N.C. July 13, 2010). We deny Dragomir’s motion to appoint
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.