United States of America v. DANIEL DEMETRIUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee

09-7268Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 oct. 2009

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7268
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DANIEL DEMETRIUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:04-cr-00262-FL-1)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Demetrius James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret
Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Demetrius James, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. James, No. 5:04-cr-
00262-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. filed June 30, 2009; entered July 1, 2009).
We further deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.