Kelvin Gould v. Newport News

09-6497Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 juin 2009

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6497
KELVIN GOULD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NEWPORT NEWS; VIRGINIA CIRCUIT COURT; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC
DEFENDER’S, City of Newport News, VA; ALEXANDER C. LEVY;
BRIAN P. KEELEY; OLDRIC J. LABELL, JR.; ROBERT N. PRITCHARD;
ALEXANDRIA CHUN; AARON M. THOMPSON, Detective; JEFFREY C.
ROUNTREE, Attorney at Law,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00092-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin Gould, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Gould v. Newport News, No. 2:09-cv-
00092-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2009). We deny Gould’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.