Icilma Burroughs v. Scottmadden, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1541
ICILMA BURROUGHS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SCOTTMADDEN, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-cv-00193-F)
Submitted: March 29, 2010 Decided: April 19, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela Newell Gray, GRAY NEWELL, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellant. Gregory W. Brown, BROWN LAW, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Icilma Burroughs appeals the district court’s order
granting ScottMadden’s motion to dismiss Burroughs’ complaint
alleging claims of employment discrimination and retaliation in
violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e – 2000e-17 (2006) and 42 U.S.C.
§ 1981 (2006) and negligent and intentional infliction of
emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Burroughs v. ScottMadden, Inc., No.
5:07-cv-00193-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --