Richard K. Revely v. City of Huntington, a municipal corporation

09-1529Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 mai 2010

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1529
RICHARD K. REVELY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON, a municipal corporation; HUNTINGTON
POLICE DEPARTMENT; SERGEANT BOOTH, individually and in his
capacity as a police officer of the City of Huntington,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN DOES, One through Twelve,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00648)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard K. Revely, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Q. Ashworth, Steven
Kenneth Nord, OFFUTT NORD, Huntington, West Virginia, for
Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Richard K. Revely appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) action against them and entering judgment in their favor.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Revely’s motions for appointment of counsel
and Defendants’ motion to strike Revely’s informal brief and
affirm the district court’s judgment. Revely v. City of
Huntington, No. 3:07-cv-00648 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 23, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.