Brian E. Peltier v. Jobe C. Metts, Md

09-1173Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit3 août 2009

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1173
BRIAN E. PELTIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOBE C. METTS, MD; MUSC; TENET SOUTH CAROLINA, d/b/a East
Cooper Regional Medical Center; UNIVERSITY MEDICAL
ASSOCIATES; J. C. NICHOLSON, JR., Circuit Court Judge State
of SC; FLORIDA MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED; SANDRA J.
SENN; ROBIN L. JACKSON; THE LAW FIRM OF SANDRA J. SENN;
ROBERT H. HOOD, JR.; HOOD LAW FIRM, LLC; LINDSAY K. SMITH-
YANCEY; DOUGLAS PRATT-THOMAS; THE LAW FIRM OF PRATT-THOMAS
WALKER; HUGH W. BUYCK; DARREN K. SANDERS; ALL DEFENDANTS
INSURANCE COMPANIES, tbd at discovery phase of this trial;
THOMAS E. KEENE, MD; RHONDA RICHARDSON, MUSC affiliation;
SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:09-cv-00044-DCN)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian E. Peltier, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Brian E. Peltier appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Peltier v. Metts, No. 2:09-cv-00044-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 28,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.