Willie Lee Berry v. M. Timothy Porterfield

08-8571Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 mai 2009

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8571
WILLIE LEE BERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. TIMOTHY PORTERFIELD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:01-cv-00627-GCM)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Lee Berry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lee Berry appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of its previous order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v.
Porterfield, No. 3:01-cv-00627-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.