Ronald K. Bilderbeck v. Patricia R. Stansberry

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6979
RONALD K. BILDERBECK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; A. F. BEELER; PETER
LIBERO, Doctor; RICHARD SCHOTT; MACK BONNER,
Doctor; R. HALL, Doctor; HARRELL WATTS; MS.
PAQUARELLE; SAMUEL D. STANLEY, Doctor; K. M.
WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:06-ct-03106-H)
Submitted: November 6, 2007 Decided: November 19, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald K. Bilderbeck, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

*Bilderbeck also seeks on appeal to characterize his
negligence claims as state law claims over which the district court
had diversity jurisdiction, but because his pleadings in the
district court did not adequately assert this ground for relief we
do not consider it here. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ronald K. Bilderbeck appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint asserting deliberate indifference
to medical needs and medical negligence pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680
(2000).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bilderbeck v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-ct-03106-H (E.D.N.C.
Dec. 19, 2006 & Mar. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --