Stanley Harley v. Kenneth Bradford

07-6278Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 juin 2007

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6278
STANLEY HARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH BRADFORD; DONALD KITT; BERNARD WALKER;
VIOLA BLACK; JOHN DELOACH; VALERIE JONES;
SHIRLEY S. MARACHESI; GEORGE T. HAGAN; CARL J.
FREDERICK; UNIDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (6:06-cv-01852-GRA)
Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 28, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Harley, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr.,
Keely Mikhael McComb McCoy, CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Harley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Harley v. Bradford,
No. 6:06-cv-01852-GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.