Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr. v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation

07-4278Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 janv. 2008

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1083
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(1:97-cv-01969-WDQ)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael N. Russo,
Jr., COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA, Annapolis, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district
court’s orders denying his motion to reopen a civil action and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Toyota Motor
Credit Corp., No. 1:97-cv-01969-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2007; Dec. 18,
2007). Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.