Tommy Farrar v. Lt. Hodge

*Judge Duncan did not participate in consideration of this
case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7785
TOMMY FARRAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LT. HODGE; OFFICER ELLIS; OFFICER CURTIS; LIEUTENANT ALFORD;
LIEUTENANT MERIDITH; SERGEANT MCCORMICK; OFFICER DIPONTE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:06-ct-03079-D)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: September 10, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN,* Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Farrar, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Farrar appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Farrar v. Hodge, No.
5:06-ct-03079-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --