Clarence Lyles v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . We have…

06-6552Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit6 oct. 2006

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6552
CLARENCE LYLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIE SCOTT, Warden; GADDY LASSITER; S.
KNIGHT, Health Administrator; WAYNE H.
CALABRESE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WACKENHUT CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:03-cv-176-BO)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 6, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr.,
WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Lyles appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Holly
v. Scott, 434 F.3d 287 (4th Cir. 2006) (Bivens action may not be
brought against individual officers in a privately-run federal
correctional facility such as Rivers Correctional Institution).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Lyles’
complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.